Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42183528›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

How leadership emotional intelligence promotes team innovation: parallel mediating roles of psychological safety and knowledge sharing.

Suxuan Xing, Xiaomei Yu, Jun Yu, Jiajia Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Suxuan XingSchool of Sports Training, Chengdu Sport University, Chengdu, China.
Xiaomei YuSchool of Physical Education and Health Management, Chongqing University of Education, Chongqing, China.
Jun YuSchool of Physical Education and Health Management, Chongqing University of Education, Chongqing, China.
Jiajia ChenPhysical Education Department, Luoxian Middle School, Chenzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines how leadership emotional intelligence drives team innovation through two distinct mechanisms. Using multilevel structural equation modeling with data from 65 leaders and 391 team members, we reveal that emotionally intelligent leaders influence innovation through both psychological security and knowledge sharing, though with markedly different strengths. Psychological security-the sense that team members can voice ideas without fear-emerges as the primary mechanism, substantially outweighing the effect of knowledge sharing. This dual-pathway mechanism suggests that leadership emotional intelligence operates by first establishing an affective foundation of safety, within which cognitive and behavioral engagement in innovation naturally unfolds. Our findings demonstrate that the relationship between leadership emotional intelligence and team innovation is not straightforward but works through layered mechanisms that vary in their relative importance. This distinction challenges the common assumption that all mediating pathways carry equal weight and highlights why emotionally intelligent leaders are particularly effective: they create the psychological conditions that make team members willing to contribute ideas and take innovative risks. The research contributes to understanding leadership influence on team performance and provides insight into which leadership capabilities matter most for fostering innovation.

Indexed as

knowledge sharingleadership emotional intelligenceparallel mediation effectpsychological securityteam innovation

Identifiers

PMID42183528
PMCPMC13194025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.