Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42183526›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2026

Addressing gender inequalities in music theory education: a gender-responsive flipped classroom framework.

Qisen Zhu, Jinglong Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Qisen ZhuFaculty of Education, University Kebangsaan Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia.
Jinglong LiDepartment of Industrial Design, Faculty of Design and Architecture, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While music education plays a vital role in shaping learners' identities and participation, persistent gender inequalities continue to influence engagement, particularly in music theory education, where abstract content and traditionally lecture-dominated pedagogies may reinforce unequal participation. Although flipped classroom (FC) and self-directed learning (SDL) are widely recognized for enhancing engagement and learner autonomy, their application has largely remained generic and insufficiently responsive to the discipline-specific cognitive demands of music theory and to gendered participation patterns. To address this gap, this study develops a gender-responsive FC-SDL framework tailored to undergraduate music theory education. Drawing on a structured literature synthesis of 46 studies published between 2015 and 2025 and employing iterative thematic analysis, the study identifies key instructional, learner-related, and contextual mechanisms shaping engagement and participation. The findings indicate that learning in music theory is grounded in discipline-specific tasks-including harmonic analysis, counterpoint construction, and aural training-which require the integration of symbolic reasoning, auditory perception, and rule-based processing. At the same time, gendered differences in confidence, participation, and self-regulation function as mediating mechanisms that influence how learners engage with these tasks and may reproduce inequalities if not explicitly addressed in instructional design. Building on these insights, the proposed framework integrates task-specific learning processes with gender-responsive instructional strategies, advancing a mechanism-based and discipline-sensitive model. This study offers a theoretically grounded and practically applicable framework for promoting equitable participation and effective learning in music theory education.

Indexed as

flipped classroomgender equityinclusionmusic educationself-directed learning

Identifiers

PMID42183526
PMCPMC13190532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.