ReviewFrontiers in psychology2026
The social hierarchies and intra-group dynamics of symphony orchestras: a psychological perspective on ensemble cohesion.
Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Symphony orchestras require highly precise coordination under time pressure and can be analyzed through a high-reliability organizing lens, insofar as larger uncorrected disruptions in timing, balance, or entry may cascade into salient artistic breakdowns. Yet aural cohesion is produced within a stratified system involving conductors, principals, and section players, which can create subgroup boundaries and social fragmentation. This Mini Review integrates identity-based and job-demands-resources perspectives to explain how hierarchical control, evaluative exposure, perfectionistic norms, and role ambiguity increase burnout risk when autonomy, voice, fairness, and psychological safety are constrained. We propose the Orchestral Dynamics Moderation Model, in which shared leadership and high social identity clarity buffer the pathway from hierarchical stressors to burnout and performance variability, and we identify bullying and mobbing as an under measured structural risk. We conclude by outlining priorities for longitudinal, multimethod, and cross-cultural research, including naturalistic psychophysiology such as HRV and cortisol and intervention trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.