ReviewFrontiers in psychology2026
Hearing movement, seeing sound: multimodal predictive coding in pianist-dancer interaction.
Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Live piano accompaniment for dance poses a "zero-latency paradox": performers achieve near-simultaneous audiovisual alignment despite sensory and integration delays that should make purely reactive control too slow. This review argues that pianist-dancer coordination can be usefully framed as bidirectional inference under cross-modal predictive coding, supported by converging behavioral, kinematic, and neurophysiological evidence. Motion-capture and time-series studies suggest that pianists can use dancers' preparatory kinematics, such as trajectory shifts and acceleration changes, to shorten the prediction window for timing and dynamics, while neuroimaging and EEG findings indicate action-perception coupling consistent with internal simulation of action-sound mappings ("seeing sound"). Sensorimotor synchronization paradigms show that micro-timing perturbations in auditory beats elicit rapid, asymmetric phase correction in stepping and tapping, consistent with predictive control in dancers ("hearing movement"), and autonomic measures further suggest that musical tension can modulate arousal before overt movement changes. Integrating coupled-oscillator modeling and EEG hyperscanning, we highlight quantifiable bidirectional adaptation and converging evidence that coordination is dynamically co-regulated rather than purely reactive or unidirectional. Taken together, the reviewed literature supports a neurally informed account of closed-loop dyadic coordination while also underscoring the need for more direct evidence from pianist-dancer interaction itself.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.