ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Learners' perceptions of the medical pause: cognitive load and team performance.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The medical pause is a theoretical framework describing how brief interruptions in clinical activities can optimize cognitive load through reflection and relaxation. However, little is known about what occurs during instructor-prompted and learner-led pauses in simulation-based training. This study investigates whether reflection or relaxation predominates during the specific pauses and how these activities influence cognitive load and performance. Methods: Fifty-two medical students (13 teams) participated in an emergency medicine team simulation, assigned either to a pause group or a control group. A mixed-methods design was employed, combining semi-structured focus group interviews with quantitative assessments of cognitive load and performance. Results: Three themes emerged: (1) dynamic fluctuations of cognitive load at the individual level, (2) perceived usefulness of pausing, and (3) the central role of team leadership. Reflecting the dynamic nature, no significant quantitative differences were found between groups at the individual level. However, Bayesian analysis provided anecdotal evidence that leaders in the pause group experienced higher germane load, suggesting greater reflective engagement during pauses. Discussion: These findings indicate that the pauses may foster reflection, particularly among leaders. The study discusses the limitations of one-time quantitative measures in complex simulations and recommends adopting team-based rather than individual-level analyses of cognitive load and performance in future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.