Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42183445›Full record

ArticleMedical science educator2026

Docs of the Roundtable: the use of Medical School Process Groups to Foster Healthy Professional Identity Formation.

Ellen House, Carrie Kelly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science educator, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ellen House *Department of Psychiatry and Health Behavior, Augusta University/University of Georgia Medical Partnership, 55 Carlton St, Athens, GA 30602 USA.ORCID 0009-0004-8611-0389
Carrie Kelly *Department of Pediatrics, Augusta University/University of Georgia Medical Partnership, Athens, GA USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Medical education should attend to student professional identity formation, the transformative process when a student incorporates the values and ideals of the profession of medicine into their own identity. A mentor-led, group reflection program was created to support medical students on their clerkships and encourage building of intentional professional identities, with the aim of sparking an ongoing practice of shared reflection and increased resilience. Materials and methods: Medical students participated in clerkship process groups (CPGs) during their 3rd and 4th year. Surveys were created and distributed to all students who participated. For the initial cohort, focus groups were utilized to gain further understanding. Results: Analysis of the qualitative data from surveys and focus groups revealed four key theme areas that were impactful regarding CPGs: development, connection, safety, and structure. Conclusions: Medical schools should adopt curricula to address professional identity formation (PIF) which (1) meet the goals of intentional physician identity development, (2) are logistically feasible for the institution, and (3) avoid adding to student stress. Clerkship process groups meet these goals. This study demonstrates they are also viewed as valuable by students, increase connection, spark reflective practices, and foster PIF. As institutions work to implement pedagogical approaches to address PIF, this study demonstrates a valuable and effective approach.

Indexed as

Professional identity formationReflectionResilienceSocializationUndergraduate medical education

Identifiers

PMID42183445
PMCPMC13197530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.