ArticleMedical science educator2026
Docs of the Roundtable: the use of Medical School Process Groups to Foster Healthy Professional Identity Formation.
Article in Medical science educator, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Medical education should attend to student professional identity formation, the transformative process when a student incorporates the values and ideals of the profession of medicine into their own identity. A mentor-led, group reflection program was created to support medical students on their clerkships and encourage building of intentional professional identities, with the aim of sparking an ongoing practice of shared reflection and increased resilience. Materials and methods: Medical students participated in clerkship process groups (CPGs) during their 3rd and 4th year. Surveys were created and distributed to all students who participated. For the initial cohort, focus groups were utilized to gain further understanding. Results: Analysis of the qualitative data from surveys and focus groups revealed four key theme areas that were impactful regarding CPGs: development, connection, safety, and structure. Conclusions: Medical schools should adopt curricula to address professional identity formation (PIF) which (1) meet the goals of intentional physician identity development, (2) are logistically feasible for the institution, and (3) avoid adding to student stress. Clerkship process groups meet these goals. This study demonstrates they are also viewed as valuable by students, increase connection, spark reflective practices, and foster PIF. As institutions work to implement pedagogical approaches to address PIF, this study demonstrates a valuable and effective approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.