ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2026
Fast organ-of-origin classification for digital pathology quality control.
Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diversity over scale: Whole-slide image variety enables H&E foundation model training with fewer patches.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Digitizing large histopathology archives requires processing millions of scanned whole-slide images that must be validated rapidly. Automated organ-of-origin classification can accelerate quality control and enable early detection of mislabeled specimens. We developed a deep learning model that classifies the organ of origin from hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides using a single low-resolution thumbnail per slide in under 1 s. For training, we used thumbnails from 16,624 slides from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium (CPTAC) archives, which contain mostly primary tumor resections. The images were categorized into 14 classes based on the most common primary sites in TCGA: Bladder, Brain, Breast, Colorectal, Kidney, Liver, Lung, Pancreas, Prostate, Skin, Stomach, Thyroid gland, Uterus, and Other (encompassing the remaining tissue types). We evaluated our approach on two independent external cohorts: a 5-class cohort with 2857 slides (Colorectal, Kidney, Liver, Pancreas, and Prostate) and a comprehensive 14-class cohort (12,348 slides). The model achieved 90% balanced accuracy for the 5-class cohort and 62% for the full 14-class cohort. Notably, when considering only the predictions with high confidence, 53% of the large cohort could be classified with 74% balanced accuracy. Manual review of high-confidence misclassifications suggested that some may reflect errors in the ground truth rather than model error. Mean model inference time was 0.2 s per slide on an NVIDIA L4 GPU. Our deep learning approach demonstrates high classification performance with very low inference time, indicating its potential for real-time and cost-effective quality control in digital pathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.