Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42183391›Full record

ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2026

Report on the 2025 DICOM WSI Connectathon.

David A Clunie, Brian Napora, John Groth, Norman Zerbe, Mustafa Yousif, Gitesh Shelar, Tamás Sárga, Sean Borman, Charles Cheng, Philipp Plewa and 25 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

35 authors.

David A CluniePixelMed Publishing, Bangor, PA, USA.
Brian NaporaGestalt Diagnostics, Spokane, WA, USA.
John GrothEndeavor Health Northshore, Chicago, IL, USA.
Norman ZerbeCharité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.
Mustafa YousifUniversity of Michigan (Michigan Medicine), Detroit, MI, USA.
Gitesh ShelarCitiusTech, Mumbai, India.
Tamás Sárga3DHISTECH, Budapest, Hungary.
Sean BormanAgfa Healthcare, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Charles ChengAixMed, Santa Clara, CA, USA.
Philipp PlewaAstraZeneca, Munich, Germany.
Luís Bastião SilvaBMD Software, Ílhavo, Portugal.
Ryan BirminghamEmory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Kenneth PhilbrickGoogle, Mountain View, CA, USA.
Matti PellikkaGrundium, Tampere, Finland.
Richard PrestonHamamatsu, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.
Lucas TataHologic, Marlborough, MA, USA.
Drew AndersonHuron, St. Jacobs, ON, Canada.
Frank YangHuron, St. Jacobs, ON, Canada.
Andrey FedorovBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Saurav PatelIdentify.bio, Mumbai, India.
JiHae KwonInfinitt, Seoul, South Korea.
Michael KnappJ4Care, Mödling, Austria.
Ty UsreyLeica Biosystems, Deer Park, IL, USA.
Francisco José Carrasco TenaMeditecs, Málaga, Spain.
Emilio MadrigalMass General Brigham (MGB), Boston, MA, USA.
Dennis WangNational Cheng Kung University (NCKU)-ALOVAS, Tainan, Taiwan.
Chung-Yueh LienNational Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences (NTUNHS), Taipei, Taiwan.
Louise CollinsPathQA, London, United Kingdom.
Arjan SomersPhilips, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
Aditya SaxenaEvident Scientific (formerly Pramana), Cambridge, MA, USA.
Eric MartinProscia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Mohannad HussainRadical Imaging, Boston, MA, USA.
Paul CramTechcyte, Orem, UT, USA.
Johan DoréVisiopharm, Hoersholm, Denmark.
Filipe CarreiraVoicebrook, Roslyn Heights, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Implementation of a standard such as Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) is key to all aspects of interoperability in whole-slide imaging. But the devil is in the details, so practical testing and demonstration of specific features are needed to show the path forward for practical clinical deployment, select the appropriate profile of features, and identify gaps and opportunities for improvement. The most recent Connectathon was conducted for this purpose, as a virtual Internet-mediated event. Thirty-two (32) implementers in the role of Acquisition Manager (AP-LIS) (2), Acquisition Modality (scanner) (9), Image Manager/Archive (PACS, IMS, or VNA) (7), Image Display (viewer) (15), and Evidence Creator (annotation source) (8) participated. The AP-LIS provided HL7 V2 metadata identifying and describing patients and specimens in response to a slide barcode-based query, which was then incorporated by the scanner into standard DICOM whole-slide microscopy images, which were encoded as tiled pyramids using the TILED_FULL pattern. These images were transferred to the archive using the standard DICOM protocol, and made available for virtual microscopy viewing using the standard DICOMweb mechanisms for query and retrieval of metadata and selected frames. Human and algorithm generated annotations were produced and stored in the standard DICOM annotation format, and transferred and retrieved for display, also using the standard DICOMweb mechanisms.

Indexed as

Anatomical Pathology Laboratory Information System (AP-LIS) integrationAnnotationsConnectathonConnectivityDICOMwebDigital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM)Digital Pathology Image Acquisition (DPIA) integration profileDigital pathology interoperabilityHealth Level Seven (HL7)Image Management System (IMS)Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise (IHE)Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS)Systemized Nomenclature of Medicine - Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT)Virtual microscopyWhole-slide imaging (WSI)

Identifiers

PMID42183391
PMCPMC13194539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.