ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2026
Report on the 2025 DICOM WSI Connectathon.
Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
35 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Implementation of a standard such as Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) is key to all aspects of interoperability in whole-slide imaging. But the devil is in the details, so practical testing and demonstration of specific features are needed to show the path forward for practical clinical deployment, select the appropriate profile of features, and identify gaps and opportunities for improvement. The most recent Connectathon was conducted for this purpose, as a virtual Internet-mediated event. Thirty-two (32) implementers in the role of Acquisition Manager (AP-LIS) (2), Acquisition Modality (scanner) (9), Image Manager/Archive (PACS, IMS, or VNA) (7), Image Display (viewer) (15), and Evidence Creator (annotation source) (8) participated. The AP-LIS provided HL7 V2 metadata identifying and describing patients and specimens in response to a slide barcode-based query, which was then incorporated by the scanner into standard DICOM whole-slide microscopy images, which were encoded as tiled pyramids using the TILED_FULL pattern. These images were transferred to the archive using the standard DICOM protocol, and made available for virtual microscopy viewing using the standard DICOMweb mechanisms for query and retrieval of metadata and selected frames. Human and algorithm generated annotations were produced and stored in the standard DICOM annotation format, and transferred and retrieved for display, also using the standard DICOMweb mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.