Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42183384›Full record

ArticleResearch square2026

Neural Correlates of Palliative Care: A Feasibility Trial in Patients with Metastatic Gastrointestinal and Lung Cancer.

Eleni Fanouraki, J D Knotts, Cheryl A Page, Amanda Perry, Tor D Wager, Thalia P Wheatley, Christopher Ahern, Amber E Barnato

Registry-linked trialAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05137782 (The Science of the Art of Palliative Care Pilot), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05137782 nacompletednot on this map

The Science of the Art of Palliative Care Pilot

TypeinterventionalSponsorDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterRan2023 to 2023Enrolled7ConditionsGastrointestinal Cancer, Lung Cancer, Advanced CancerArmsSpecialty Palliative Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Eleni FanourakiThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth.
J D KnottsDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College.
Cheryl A PageSection of Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, Dartmouth Health and Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth.
Amanda PerryThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth.
Tor D WagerDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College.
Thalia P WheatleyDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College.
Christopher AhernSection of Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, Dartmouth Health and Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth.
Amber E BarnatoThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth.

Funding

Translational Engineering in Cancer (TEC)P30CA023108 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Steven D Leach · 1985 to 2026
$91.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023108
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The fundamental affective and decisional processes by which specialty palliative care (SPC) reduces suffering and decreases aggressive treatment at the end of life are not completely understood. We sought to test the feasibility, acceptability, and tolerability of conducting a clinical trial of SPC for advanced cancer patients and their care partners involving functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to further understand the mechanisms of action of SPC. Methods: This pilot open-label, single-arm observational case series was conducted at the Dartmouth Cancer Center (DCC) in collaboration with the Dartmouth Brain Imaging Center (DBIC). Participants included patients with metastatic gastrointestinal or lung cancer, their care partners, and their palliative care physician. The intervention consisted of 8-16 weeks of specialty palliative care integrated with usual oncologic care. Assessments included two fMRI study visits involving the collection of physiological measurements during audiovisual stimulation pre- and post-SPC receipt. Results: The primary outcomes were feasibility (rates of enrollment, intervention receipt), acceptability (closed-ended start and end-of- study feedback for participants and open-ended feedback for non-enrollees), and tolerability (study burden). Of 1216 screened electronic medical records, 21 patients fulfilled the eligibility criteria, of which four patients (19%) and three care partners consented to participate in the study. One participant and their care partner completed all study procedures, one participant withdrew before the first session due to disease progression, and the other two withdrew after 6 and 3 visits, respectively, due to health-related decline, logistical challenges, or emotional concerns. Conclusion: The study did not achieve its pre-determined criteria for success. Primary reasons for infeasibility were low recruitment and high attrition rates. The study's results suggest that a more definitive mechanistic study cannot be conducted at this site without addressing critical barriers to enrollment and retention in this vulnerable clinical population. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05137782, first release date 11/17/2021.

Indexed as

caregiver supportend-of-life carefMRImetastatic cancerneural correlatespalliative care

Identifiers

PMID42183384
PMCPMC13193098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.