ArticleResearch square2026
Digital Volume Correlation Challenge 2.0: A Comprehensive Dataset for Digital Volume Correlation Benchmarking.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Digital Volume Correlation (DVC) is a powerful experimental technique for quantifying 3D full-field volumetric displacements and strains. In light of its increased adoption in metrological applications, there is a critical need for benchmark datasets to systematically evaluate the performance of various DVC algorithms across different materials, imaging modalities, and deformation scenarios. Objective: Building on the foundations of DVC Challenge 1.0, the DVC Challenge 2.0 initiative aims to create a repository of DVC datasets to enable researchers to validate and refine their DVC algorithms against common benchmarks. This can help in expanding the scope and performance of DVC and foster innovation in volumetric deformation measurement. Methods: DVC Challenge 2.0 compiles a diverse collection of volumetric image sets contributed by the global research community. These datasets encompass different materials, loading conditions, and imaging modalities, including confocal/multiphoton microscopy, X-ray computed tomography (XCT), neutron tomography, and synthetically generated images. These datasets present various metrological challenges, such as complex deformation fields, poor image quality, and anisotropic or sparse speckle patterns. All datasets are published in an open repository, with a uniform image format, and a common data framework. Results: The resulting repository provides benchmark datasets for validating and comparing DVC algorithms, facilitating the exploration of DVC capabilities in diverse and challenging scenarios. Conclusion: By promoting collaboration and open data sharing, DVC Challenge 2.0 will drive innovation in volumetric deformation measurement techniques and broaden the impact of DVC. It will also help establish a baseline for comparison of DVC algorithms and codes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.