ArticleResearch square2026
Assessing the Need for Reproductive Genetic Counseling Among Adults with Cystic Fibrosis.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Reproductive health has become an increasingly important focus for people with cystic fibrosis (CF), and guidelines have recommended routine inclusion of genetic counselors on care teams to address questions regarding infertility, pregnancy planning, prenatal diagnosis, and other reproductive health considerations. Despite this, implementation of genetic counseling is still lacking, and there is limited literature documenting patient perspectives on reproductive genetic counseling, particularly in the era of highly effective cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators that have transformed the landscape of clinical care. Methods: An electronic REDCap survey was distributed to adults with CF at our center to assess the need for reproductive genetic counseling and to understand current reproductive health concerns. Descriptive statistics were used to report quantitative and demographic data, and a thematic analysis was performed for free-response data. Results: A total of 237 patients were surveyed, and 116 (49%) responded. Of the 116 respondents, 31 (27%) had never heard of genetic counseling, and 82 (71%) had not previously received it. Forty-four of these 82 (54%) reported that they would find genetic counseling moderately or very helpful. The most important reproductive health topics included the effect of CFTR modulators on fertility and pregnancy, and carrier screening for partners and family members. Qualitative analysis revealed key content categories, including Conclusions: Our findings highlight a need and desire in the modern era among adults with CF for improved education regarding reproductive health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.