Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42183333›Full record

ArticleCase reports in psychiatry2026

Twice Exceptional in Medicine: A Case Series of Neurodivergent Physicians.

Ashley Toussaint, Om Panda, Cheryl Graber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Case reports in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ashley ToussaintDepartment of Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA, rutgers.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4049-8010
Om PandaDepartment of Psychiatry, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA, rutgers.edu.
Cheryl GraberDepartment of Psychiatry, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA, rutgers.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The term twice-exceptional (2e) describes individuals who combine high intellectual potential with neurodevelopmental or psychiatric conditions that may impair performance in traditional environments. While this concept has been increasingly recognized in education, its relevance to medical training and practice has received little attention. This case series presents five physicians across different stages of training who exemplify twice-exceptionality, highlighting both their cognitive strengths and the barriers they faced in clinical environments. The first case involves a surgical resident with nonverbal learning disorder (NVLD), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and type 1 diabetes whose superior intellect masked significant executive dysfunction until repeated crises prompted disclosure and pursuit of accommodations. The second case describes a resident with ADHD and perfectionism who, through structured coping strategies and mentorship, thrived in a supportive environment. A third case highlights a senior resident with anxiety and obsessive-compulsive disorder whose perfectionism and rumination undermined efficiency and self-confidence despite positive evaluations. The fourth case involves an attending physician with ADHD and obsessive traits who maintained professional success through compensatory overwork but experienced disorganization, fatigue, and burnout. The fifth case describes another attending physician with ADHD, anxiety, and depression whose intellectual giftedness coexisted with executive dysfunction and impaired self-care, leading to chronic struggles despite ongoing treatment. Across these cases, recurring themes emerge: masking of disability by high achievement, misattribution of neurodivergent struggles as professionalism deficits, and delayed or absent accommodations. While some physicians succeed in supportive environments, others experience isolation, burnout, or attrition when their needs remain unrecognized. These cases underscore the paradox of twice-exceptionality in medicine, where extraordinary potential and hidden vulnerabilities coexist. Greater recognition of this duality is essential to building neurodiversity-affirming environments that move beyond deficit-based models, reduce stigma, and foster structures in which talented but vulnerable physicians can thrive.

Identifiers

PMID42183333
PMCPMC13191781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.