ArticleDigital health
Machine learning-based prediction of mortality in lung cancer: Application of severity-adjustment method.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally, affecting 2.2 million people and causing approximately 1.8 million deaths annually. The 5-year survival rate remains low due to risk factors such as aging, smoking, and air pollution, which also impose significant financial burdens on healthcare systems. Early mortality prediction can improve patient outcomes and reduce costs. Objective: This study aimed to develop mortality prediction models for lung cancer patients using machine learning techniques by comparing severity adjustment tools-Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), Age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (ACCI), and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI). Methods: Data from the National Hospital Discharge Injury Survey (2006-2018) were analyzed for 24,472 lung cancer patients diagnosed with ICD-10 codes C33-C34. Machine learning methods, including logistic regression, decision trees, random forests, XGBoost, support vector machines, and neural networks, were applied. Models were evaluated using area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and F1 score. Results: Random forests performed best in the training set, while XGBoost and neural networks showed superior performance in the test set. Key predictors of mortality included admission route, length of stay, and surgery status. Conclusions: XGBoost and neural network models demonstrated strong performance in predicting mortality among lung cancer patients. This study represents one of the first comparative analyses to evaluate machine learning-based mortality prediction models incorporating multiple comorbidity severity indices (CCI, ACCI, and ECI), providing evidence to support the selection of optimal severity adjustment tools and machine learning algorithms. Implementing these models, in combination with primary care and remote monitoring strategies after hospital discharge, may help reduce emergency room visits and hospital stays, thereby improving survival outcomes and alleviating healthcare costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.