ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Clinical implications of natalizumab Fab-arm exchange in patients with multiple sclerosis.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Natalizumab, a monoclonal antibody used to treat multiple sclerosis, can undergo Fab-arm exchange (FAE) with endogenous IgG4, resulting in a monovalent form with reduced avidity and presumed lower potency than the parental bivalent form. Levels of bivalent and monovalent natalizumab depend on the ratio of endogenous IgG4 to total natalizumab, which varies substantially between individuals. The clinical relevance of natalizumab FAE remains unknown. This study investigated the potential clinical implications of bivalent and monovalent natalizumab levels regarding progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), extended interval dosing (EID) and wearing-off symptoms, using multiple cohorts of natalizumab-treated patients. Seven natalizumab-associated PML cases were each matched to two controls. Contrary to the hypothesis that higher bivalent levels might increase PML risk, cases showed a trend toward lower bivalent natalizumab levels, although definite conclusions were limited by small sample size. In patients receiving EID, both total and bivalent natalizumab levels decreased compared to standard interval dosing, with a greater median individual decrease in bivalent natalizumab than in total natalizumab (94% versus 78%). Notably, in more than half of patients receiving EID, bivalent natalizumab levels fell below the quantification limit (<0.1 µg/mL). Finally, patients experiencing wearing-off symptoms during natalizumab treatment had lower bivalent natalizumab levels, although this warrants validation in larger cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.