ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
The role of inflammation in the immune evasion of KRas.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
KRas, NRas and HRas mutations are recognized in over 25% of all tumors, with the predominant mutations occurring at amino acids G12 or G13. While small molecule inhibitors of KRas show therapeutic promise, KRas has largely resisted control by immunotherapy in clinical cases, although immune responses may be detected following vaccination. Inflammation is a recognized precursor of most KRas-associated tumors. In inflammation cathepsin B leaks from the lysosome and at the higher pH of the cytoplasm acquires endopeptidase activity, in addition to its exopeptidase role. Cathepsin B is consistently upregulated in tumors and its role in tumorigenesis has been attributed to increased apoptosis and digestion of the extracellular matrix. Here we examine the effect of cathepsin B on neoepitopes in KRas. We predict that cathepsin B cleavage patterns of KRas may lead to the destruction of the G12 and G13 mutant neoepitope peptides that would otherwise bind to MHC I, thereby rendering them immunologically invisible. We review reports of the interaction of cathepsin B with trypsinogen in the pancreas and caspases in inflammasomes and the potential effect of premature activation of trypsin on immune evasion of G12R mutants. We summarize our observations and literature review in a schematic describing the potential role inflammation and the actions of cathepsin B, trypsin, and caspases on the immune evasion of KRas and related Ras family gene products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.