ReviewScientifica2026
Transcriptomic Insights Into the Evolution of Snake Venom: Mechanisms, Diversity, and Adaptation.
Review in Scientifica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deciphering the Multi-Target Mechanisms of Sheshang Jiedu Decoction Against Snake Envenomation-Induced Acute Hepatic Dysfunction: An Integrated Multi-Omics Study.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Transcriptomic Insights Into the Evolution of Snake Venom: Mechanisms, Diversity, and Adaptation.Scientifica · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Snake venoms are evolutionarily refined biochemical arsenals composed of diverse toxins with complex functional roles in predation, defense, and competition. Over the past 2 decades, transcriptomic approaches have transformed venom research by enabling high-resolution insights into gene expression dynamics, molecular diversity, and the evolutionary mechanisms driving venom variation across lineages. In this review, we present a comprehensive synthesis of snake venom transcriptomics literature and propose a conceptual framework structured around three major axes: (1) gene family expansion through duplication and neofunctionalization; (2) regulatory complexity encompassing transcriptional, posttranscriptional, and epigenetic modulation; and (3) ecological selection pressures shaping venom profiles in response to diet, habitat, and interspecific interactions. We integrate findings from diverse taxa and technologies, including bulk RNA sequencing, long-read transcriptomics, and spatial or single-cell approaches, to highlight progress and gaps in current knowledge. A bibliometric analysis of 358 studies from 2002 to 2024 reveals significant growth in the field, with key contributions from institutions in the United States, Brazil, and Australia. Despite this progress, transcriptomic research remains geographically and taxonomically biased, with challenges in toxin annotation, data standardization, and integrative multiomics still unresolved. We conclude by emphasizing the growing role of integration with other omics approaches, advancements in single-cell transcriptomics, and the emerging potential of computational modeling in reconstructing venom evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.