Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42183120›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions2026

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes in Intra-aortic Balloon Pump-Supported Cardiogenic Shock Among Patients Transferred to Tertiary Care Centers.

Jonas Sundermeyer, Rachna Kataria, A Reshad Garan, Song Li, Van-Khue Ton, Elric Zweck, Manreet K Kanwar, Jaime Hernandez-Montfort, Shashank S Sinha, Jacob Abraham and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. The Challenge of Cardiogenic Shock Transfers: The Devil in the Details.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Jonas SundermeyerThe Cardiovascular Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Rachna KatariaBrown University Health Cardiovascular Institute, Providence, Rhode Island.
A Reshad GaranBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Song LiInstitute for Advanced Cardiac Care, Medical City Healthcare, Dallas, Texas.
Van-Khue TonMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Elric ZweckDepartment of Cardiology, Pulmonology, and Vascular Medicine, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Manreet K KanwarUniversity of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Jaime Hernandez-MontfortBaylor Scott & White Health, Advanced Heart Failure Program Clinic, Temple, Texas.
Shashank S SinhaInova Heart and Vascular Institute, Inova Fairfax Campus, Falls Church, Virginia.
Jacob AbrahamCenter for Cardiovascular Analytics, Research, & Data Science (CARDS), Providence St. Joseph Research Network, Portland, Oregon.
Kevin J JohnThe Cardiovascular Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Paavni SangalThe Cardiovascular Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Claudius MahrInstitute for Advanced Cardiac Care, Medical City Healthcare, Dallas, Texas.
Daniel BurkhoffCardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York.
Navin K KapurThe Cardiovascular Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Cardiogenic Shock Working Group Academic Research Consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) is a commonly used temporary mechanical circulatory support device in cardiogenic shock (CS). A substantial proportion of patients receive IABP at referring hospitals prior to transfer. The aim of this study was to compare clinical characteristics, treatment strategies, and outcomes between transferred and nontransferred IABP-treated patients with all-cause CS, acute myocardial infarction-related CS (AMI-CS), and heart failure-related CS (HF-CS). Methods: Intra-aortic balloon pump-treated CS patients from the multicenter Cardiogenic Shock Working Group registry (2020-2024) were analyzed. Adjusted logistic regression models were used to assess associations between transfer status and in-hospital mortality, native heart survival, heart replacement therapies, and in-hospital complications. Results: Among 2112 IABP-treated patients (36.6% AMI-CS, 48.9% HF-CS), 652 (30.9%) were primarily treated at referring centers and transferred. Transferred patients more frequently had AMI-CS (57.8% vs 27.1%) and less often HF-CS (27.5% vs 58.4%) than nontransferred subjects. Transfer was associated with higher in-hospital mortality (33.1% vs 26.4%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.38; 95% CI, 1.13-1.68; Conclusions: Transfer status was independently associated with higher in-hospital mortality and complications. These findings emphasize the importance of structured referral pathways and heightened awareness at hub centers for this potentially high-risk IABP-treated CS cohort.

Indexed as

cardiogenic shockintra-aortic balloon pumpoutcometransfer

Identifiers

PMID42183120
PMCPMC13198140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.