ReviewVeterinary evidence
Can cytology accurately predict the malignancy of feline mammary gland tumours?
Review in Veterinary evidence. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PICO question: In cats with mammary gland tumours, is cytology compared to histopathology an accurate method for predicting the malignancy of the tumour? Clinical bottom line: Category of research: Diagnosis. Number and type of study designs reviewed: One case series and two diagnostic accuracy studies. Strength of evidence: Moderate. Outcomes reported: In cats with mammary gland tumours, cytology can reliably predict the malignancy of the tumour when compared to histopathology as the clinical reference standard. Conclusion: There is moderate evidence to show that the diagnostic accuracy of cytology in predicting the malignancy of feline mammary gland tumours is high, especially in terms of sensitivity, but further research is needed to confirm its specificity. Due to the current uncertainties, all preoperative cytological diagnoses should be confirmed with a postoperative histopathological examination. How to apply this evidence in practice The application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient's circumstances and owners' values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources.Knowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.