ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026
Onshore human swimming motion measurement and dynamic analysis using wearable inertial sensors.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurately measuring and assessing human swimming performance remains challenging due to difficulties in capturing full-body motion in horizontal postures and evaluating swimming dynamics based on measured data. This study proposes an integrated framework combining wearable inertial measurement units (IMUs), an onshore swim trainer, and a multi-rigid-body dynamic model to measure swimming kinematics and evaluate swimming performance. Seventeen wireless IMUs are used to capture full-body motion data during onshore breaststroke, freestyle, and butterfly strokes, and comparison with optical motion capture data demonstrates that the IMU-based measurement scheme has good validity (Spearman's correlation >0.75), reliability (ICC >0.75), and accuracy (NRMSE <25%) for most body segments. However, lower limb and trunk motions deviate from typical in-water patterns due to restricted downward swing on the onshore trainer. To assess swimming performance with the IMU-measured data, a Newton-Euler dynamic model incorporating fluid forces is developed. Simulations reveal that stroke frequency (SF) has a significant effect on swimming speed and propulsion force across the three strokes. Two case studies further demonstrate the framework's potential for motion optimization: modifying arm movements in freestyle and trunk movements in butterfly can improve swimming performance. Overall, this framework enables reliable and efficient onshore swimming motion measurement, dynamic performance assessment, and individualized technique optimization, which could provide a supplementary tool and preliminary screening method for guiding swimming training and swimming robot development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.