In one paragraphArticle in IMA fungus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
5 authors.
Xue ZhongKey Laboratory of Forest Protection of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China Key Laboratory of Forest Protection of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry Beijing China https://ror.org/0360dkv71.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6817-2006 Hermann VoglmayrDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna Vienna Austria https://ror.org/03prydq77.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7666-993X Han XueKey Laboratory of Forest Protection of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China Key Laboratory of Forest Protection of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry Beijing China https://ror.org/0360dkv71.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0414-6237 Yong LiKey Laboratory of Forest Protection of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China Key Laboratory of Forest Protection of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry Beijing China https://ror.org/0360dkv71.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4406-1329 Ning JiangKey Laboratory of Forest Protection of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China Key Laboratory of Forest Protection of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry Beijing China https://ror.org/0360dkv71.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9656-8500 Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
Indexed as
Ascomycotacryptic speciesfoliar pathogensmulti-locus phylogenySordariomycetesSouthern Chinataxonomy
Identifiers
PMID42182985
PMCPMC13197814
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390