Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42182983›Full record

ReviewF1000Research2024

Geophysics for the environment in Indonesia.

Achmad Darul, Dasapta Erwin Irawan, Eleonora Agustine

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in F1000Research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Achmad DarulDepartement of Geology, Faculty of Industrial Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sumatera, Way Hui, South Lampung, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4807-9427
Dasapta Erwin IrawanApplied Geology Research Group, Faculty of Earth Sciences and Technology, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1526-0863
Eleonora AgustineFaculty of Geology, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental geophysics holds significant but underutilized potential for tackling Indonesia's diverse environmental challenges by supporting investigations of groundwater contamination, water infiltration, and the accumulation of metals in soils and crops-issues crucial for agriculture, public health, and sustainable land management. Emerging technologies such as UAV-assisted imaging, airborne surveys, and oceanographic geophysical observations further demonstrate the flexibility of modern geophysics in studying coastal processes, wave behaviour, and coral reef conditions. However, its application-especially in urban Indonesia-remains limited due to physical obstructions, cultural noise, restricted workspace, regulatory hurdles, and safety concerns, while the absence of geophysical test sites (GTS) and a shortage of skilled practitioners constrain methodological advancement and training. Based on bibliometric analysis of Scopus-indexed publications, this study shows that integration between geophysics and environmental science is growing but still insufficient. Strengthening environmental geophysics in Indonesia requires developing dedicated training and calibration facilities, fostering interdisciplinary collaboration, and adopting technological innovations tailored to dense urban and complex geological settings so that geophysics can play a more effective role in environmental monitoring, resource sustainability, and resilience to ecological and urban challenges.

Indexed as

EnvironmentEnvironmental MonitoringGeologyGroundwaterIndonesiaaquifersenvironmental problemsgeologygeophysicsgroundwatersubsurface analysesurban areasurban hydrogeology

Identifiers

PMID42182983
PMCPMC13191308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.