Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42182982›Full record

ArticleOpen research Europe2025

Insights from an extensive multi-step multi-stakeholder engagement in circular bio-based economy.

Gülşah Yilan, Elina Dace, Mariam Rasheed, Luana Ladu, Valentina Vavassori, Susanna Albertini, Gabor Mester, Piergiuseppe Morone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open research Europe, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gülşah YilanUniversity of Rome Unitelma Sapienza, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6392-8469
Elina DaceUniversity of Rome Unitelma Sapienza, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7880-0820
Mariam RasheedBAM Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing, Berlin, Germany.
Luana LaduBAM Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing, Berlin, Germany.
Valentina VavassoriFVA New Media Research, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3805-0420
Susanna AlbertiniFVA New Media Research, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7330-8722
Gabor MesterPEDAL Consulting s.r.o., Martin, Slovakia.
Piergiuseppe MoroneUniversity of Rome Unitelma Sapienza, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The goal of achieving a net-zero emissions European economy by 2050 requires a shift from linear fossil-based to circular bio-based systems. However, this transition relies on societal transformations, cutting-edge technologies, and multi-actor processes, which in turn require new economic frameworks and policy priorities. This study bridges the gap between literature and circular bio-based economy (CBBE) practice by presenting the results of stakeholder engagement activities where the barriers identified in the literature were discussed, ranked and validated. Methods: Adopting a three-step approach, including a focus group, interviews, and a final survey, we present a list of 31 barriers under six different clusters: cultural, economic, environmental, governance, structural, and technical hindering the transition to a CBBE. Results: The literature findings validated through stakeholder engagement underline that the transition requires structural and governance changes to steer the current economic model to a more circular and sustainable one. The most prominent barriers include: Consumer confusion and lack of trust due to generic sustainability claims and the proliferation of certification schemes and labels; High investment costs and risks for establishing circular bio-based industries; Concerns over (local) biomass feedstock availability within the limits of carrying capacity; Regulatory complexities and lack of support for the transition at the government level; Lack of harmonized waste collection systems and infrastructure and Incompatible and/or insufficient infrastructure capacity for EoL product collection, transportation, storage and management. Conclusions: Stakeholder involvement is a critical element of the transition to CBBE, to bridge the gap between scientific advancements and practical implementation. This study aims to identify the most prominent barriers to the CBBE transition with an extensive stakeholder engagement strategy with representatives from the construction, chemicals, plastics, and textile sectors. The findings in this study are expected to feed into the further development of policy recommendations to overcome these barriers in the transition.

Indexed as

Barriercircular bio-based economyfocus groupquadruple helixsustainable transitionvalidation.

Identifiers

PMID42182982
PMCPMC13197747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.