ArticleInfectious Disease Modelling2026
Symptom-based diagnostic models for common respiratory viral infections: a machine learning and natural language processing study.
Article in Infectious Disease Modelling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: This study aimed to develop an efficient and cost-saving diagnostic approach using natural language processing and explainable machine learning models. Subject and methods: 11,863 Influenza-like illness cases from Huzhou City, China for four common respiratory viruses were collected: SARS-CoV-2, influenza, respiratory syncytial virus, and adenovirus. Natural language processing techniques were employed to extract and normalize symptom features from unstructured clinical text. Five machine learning algorithms were evaluated using AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity to select the best-performing model. Subgroup analyses by age, sex, and fever status assessed model robustness, and SHAP values were calculated for interpretability. Results: Compared with existing diagnostic tools, our model demonstrated higher accuracy and better predictive performance, with AUCs of 0.856 (95% CI: 0.830-0.881) for SARS-CoV-2, 0.737 (95% CI: 0.713-0.760) for Influenza, 0.801 (95% CI: 0.744-0.857) for RSV, and 0.782 (95% CI: 0.748-0.816) for adenovirus, showing particularly high capability for SARS-CoV-2 and RSV. Subgroup analyses showed particularly excellent discriminative accuracy in pediatric or afebrile patients. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the feasibility of integrating natural language processing and machine learning techniques for identification of respiratory viruses based solely on symptoms, and offers a low-cost and efficient alternative to PCR testing, which can reduce reliance on resource-intensive testing and enhance early detection in clinical practice. This approach can support early screening and resource allocation in both clinical and public health settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.