ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026
Molecular and morphological characteristics of
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The intestinal nematode Methods: Morphological, biometrical, and molecular analyses of Results: Males exhibited an extremely long cloaca with a complex, unique course, as well as a long, slender spicule, measuring 4.7-5.6 mm. Additionally, the junction between the ejaculatory duct and the vas efferens formed a distinct muscular constriction. Females exhibited an uneverted aspinous vulva and a highly convoluted vagina containing a unique egg chamber. A subset of adult worms was characterized using three molecular markers, which yielded 30 unique sequences: two variants for 18S, 14 variants for the ITS regions, and 13 variants for COI. Phylogenetic trees constructed for all DNA markers placed Conclusion: Integrative morphological, molecular, and phylogenetic analysis indicated that this species is both morphologically and molecularly distinct from its congeners. Furthermore, the evidence suggests that it exclusively infects SACs and potentially other camelids within captive populations worldwide. Similar integrative approaches are necessary for the taxonomic revision of the genus
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.