ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026
Deep learning-enabled morphology analysis of bovine sperm for label-free imaging flow cytometry.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sperm Recovery and Evaluation in Domestic Species: Challenges and Current Practices.Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Data analysis of sperm morphology is critical for evaluating bull fertility, yet it is commonly performed using light microscopy and staining techniques in a subjective and manual manner. In this study, we introduce a scalable, high-resolution approach combining label-free Imaging Flow Cytometry with deep learning for automated classification of bovine sperm morphology. We analyzed 401,535 single-cell images obtained out 1.8 million events acquired at 40 × magnification from three bull breeds - Kazakh Whitehead, Auliekol, and Simmental, from fresh and cryopreserved sperm - providing a uniquely large and diverse dataset. The dataset was used for training and evaluation of deep learning models. Multiple classification strategies and architectures were evaluated using consistent training and data preparation strategies, including MobileNetV3-Large, EfficientNetV2-S, ResNet-50, and ConvNeXt-Tiny. Among these, the ConvNeXt-Tiny yielded superior results, achieving an accuracy 91.1% and a macro F1-score of 0.91 after training with a Linear Probing and Fine-Tuning (LP-FT) strategy, and was chosen as the primary model to classify spermatozoa into eight distinct morphological categories. Testing across different conditions and breeds resulted in a 10-15% drop in generalization performance, highlighting the limitations in generalization due to dataset variability and underscoring the need for larger, standardized imaging protocols. The proportion of morphologically abnormal spermatozoa differed by seasons and following cryopreservation. This study highlights the advantages of integrating IFC and artificial intelligence algorithms for robust, high-throughput, and objective label-free assessment of spermatozoa morphology in both fresh and cryopreserved sperm, offering a promising tool for improving fertility diagnostics and breeding strategies in veterinary practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.