ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026
Intradermal testing and allergen-specific IgE testing in dogs with eosinophilic bronchopneumopathy and healthy dogs.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hypersensitivity reactions are considered as a potential etiology of canine eosinophilic bronchopneumopathy (EBP). Objectives: To investigate positive reactions in intradermal allergy testing (IDT) and allergen-specific serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) testing in dogs with EBP and healthy control dogs, and to compare the results between groups. Material and methods: Twenty-one dogs diagnosed with EBP and 22 healthy controls were included in the prospective case-control study. IDT with 41 allergens and an Fc-ε receptor-based serum test for allergen-specific IgE of 23 allergens were performed. Positive reactions were compared between groups using Pearson's Chi-squared test and false discovery rate correction for multiple testing. Agreement between the two test methods was evaluated with Cohen's Kappa test. The Results: Dogs with EBP showed significantly more median positive reactions in IDT [8.0 (5.0-12.0)] compared to healthy control dogs [4.0 (1.0-8.0; Conclusion: Dogs with EBP are more likely to show positive reactions in IDT compared to healthy control dogs. However, similar findings in healthy controls and poor agreement with serum IgE results limit conclusions regarding clinical relevance. Thus, IDT and serum IgE results should be interpreted cautiously and in the context of clinical findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.