ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026
Animal disease traceability: evaluation of simulated foot-and-mouth disease outbreak metrics with implementation of improved contact tracing of cattle.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In the event of a Foot-and-Mouth Disease (FMD) introduction in the United States (US) animal health officials will need to rapidly trace infected animals and their contacts. Electronic identification (EID) and digital tracing of cattle could improve the speed and accuracy of tracing efforts. This study evaluated the impacts of improving cattle traceability during an FMD outbreak in the US. Methods: InterSpread Plus (ISP) was used to simulate FMD outbreaks with a US national livestock population file and animal movement parameters. Scenarios were defined by starting location (California, Nebraska, Texas, New Mexico, New York, and Tennessee), farm type (dairy, feedlot, stocker, cow calf), detection day (8, 14, or 21), and tracing level. The tracing levels represented the current speed and accuracy in the US, a partial EID tracing or an ideal EID tracing implementation. A secondary objective investigated decreasing the geographical size of control areas and surveillance zones under the ideal tracing level. We assessed outcome metrics (infected premises (IPs), outbreak duration, and number of farms under surveillance or in control areas) using a calculation of difference between scenarios and bootstrap confidence interval estimation. Results and discussion: Improved tracing showed the largest potential for decreasing outbreak size when the outbreaks were detected on day 21. The distribution of IPs decreased consistently at the median and beyond with some scenarios showing decreases as low as the 10th percentile. Similar trends were seen in the duration of outbreaks and number of farms in surveillance zones. When the size of control areas and surveillance zones decreased, the number of IPs tended to increase while the number of farms under surveillance decreased in some scenarios and increased in others. Our results support the value of improved cattle traceability that is rapid and accurate for decreasing the risk of large FMD outbreaks in the US. An improved traceability system could also decrease demands for human labor to conduct traces and surveillance during the outbreak, and improve business continuity of producers during and outbreak. More research into the economic trade-offs and EID feasibility are needed to determine the best implementation of EID tracing systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.