Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42182901›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026

Traumatic dentoalveolar injury, tooth wear, and periodontal disease in working and non-working dogs (2018-2022).

Shawna Han, Alexander M Reiter, Darko Stefanovski, Ana C Castejón-González

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shawna HanMSPCA-Angell Animal Medical Center, Dentistry and Oral Surgery Service, Boston, MA, United States.
Alexander M ReiterTierzahnzentrum München, Munich, Germany.
Darko StefanovskiDepartment of Clinical Studies-New Bolton Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Kennett Square, PA, United States.
Ana C Castejón-GonzálezDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Advanced Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Periodontal disease and tooth fracture are the main reasons for tooth extraction in dogs. The objectives of this study were to compare the prevalence of traumatic dentoalveolar injury (TDI), tooth wear, and periodontal disease in working dogs (WD) and non-working dogs (NWD). Methods: Medical records of WD and NWD presented during a 4.5-year period were reviewed to identify TDI, tooth wear, and periodontal disease in WD and NWD. Periodontal disease was evaluated only in strategic teeth (canine, maxillary fourth premolar, and mandibular first molar). TDI and tooth wear were evaluated in all teeth. Results: WD had 6.3 ± 6.4 TDI and 12.7 ± 11.5 teeth with tooth wear per dog. NWD were diagnosed with 1.3 ± 1.7 TDI, and 1.9 ± 4.9 teeth with tooth wear per dog. The risk of having a TDI was 3 times higher in WD than in NWD, and the likelihood of having tooth wear was 66% higher in WD than in NWD. WD had fewer strategic teeth with severe stages of periodontal disease than NWD. Discussion: TDI, tooth wear, and periodontal disease are frequent in WD, and the prevalence of TDI is higher than previously reported. Oral examinations should be included in routine annual evaluations in WD to accurately identify and treat traumatized teeth and periodontal disease.

Indexed as

periodontal diseasestrategic teethtooth weartraumatic dentoalveolar injuryworking dog

Identifiers

PMID42182901
PMCPMC13189841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.