ArticleArthroplasty today2026
Citation Velocity and Social Media Impact Analysis of Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Randomized Controlled Trials.
Article in Arthroplasty today, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) remain crucial in establishing evidence-based care, yet little is known about which studies drive the most academic and public attention. This study aimed to identify the most impactful hip and knee arthroplasty RCTs published from 2014 through 2023 using traditional citation metrics and Altmetric data as well as determining study characteristics associated with greater impact. Methods: Clinically oriented hip and knee arthroplasty RCTs were identified and analyzed from 4 leading orthopedic journals published from 2014 through 2023. Article impact was assessed by citation velocity (citations per year) and Altmetric Attention Scores (AAS). Inequality in citation and AAS distributions was measured using Gini coefficients. Mann-Whitney U tests were used to explore associations between impact metrics and study characteristics such as funding and the presence of statistically significant findings. Results: Among the 566 RCTs, the mean citation velocity was 5.3 citations per year, and the mean AAS was 12.3. Citation velocity and AAS were weakly correlated (r = 0.34, Conclusions: The impact of hip and knee arthroplasty RCTs is highly skewed, with a small number of articles receiving a disproportionate amount of attention. Importantly, RCTs with statistically significant results were more likely to be cited, suggesting that favorable findings may disproportionately shape the arthroplasty literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.