ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2026
Deep learning-based real-time intraoperative detection of thoracic duct.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The thoracic duct (TD) is fragile in esophageal cancer surgery, and its injury may cause deadly chylothorax. Its identification is critical to prevent chylothorax and ensure patient safety. Deep learning-based image processing software may assist surgeons. This study aimed to develop and validate a deep learning-based system for real-time intraoperative detection of the thoracic duct. Methods: From 30 thoracoscopic esophagectomy videos (prone position), 2,500 images (1,400 TD annotations; 1,100 background images) were extracted. The dataset was divided into training/validation (2,000/500 images) and 40 test images from 5 independent videos. The YOLOv5-seg model's performance was evaluated via dice coefficient & intersection over union and was statistically compared with resident and attending surgeons. Results: The artificial intelligence (AI) model's segmentation performance was superior to that of resident surgeons but inferior to that of attending surgeons. The AI system achieved a 92.5% accuracy, with a mean dice coefficient of 0.677 and an intersection over union (IoU) of 0.569. The AI system demonstrated significantly lower Dice performance than attending surgeons (0.677 Conclusions: This study demonstrates the technical feasibility of a deep learning-based real-time TD segmentation system. The model achieved segmentation performance superior to that of resident surgeons but inferior to that of attending surgeons and suggests its potential as a technical foundation for future AI-guided intraoperative applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.