ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2026
Radiologic reporting of DeBakey type I aortic dissection: key preoperative and postoperative findings of the AMDS hybrid stent.
Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The computed tomography (CT) scan is the gold standard imaging for the diagnosis of DeBakey type I aortic dissection (D1AD) as well as for follow-up after surgical repair. Novel endovascular and hybrid repair devices for have been increasingly utilized in recent years for D1AD, such as the AMDS Hybrid Prosthesis (Artivion, Georgia, USA). Herein, we describe the key radiologic findings on the preoperative CT that aids in decision-making regarding use of the AMDS and the pertinent findings of the AMDS on postoperative CT scan. The AMDS is implanted at the time of surgical intervention for D1AD. A transverse aortic incision is made 1cm proximal to the innominate artery and the device is deployed at the distal anastomosis into the aortic arch. Key findings to note on preoperative CT scan that determine suitability for use of the AMDS include the extent of the dissection, location of entry tears, and branch vessel involvement. The design of the AMDS includes a proximal felt sewing cuff with a bare metal stent. Areas that may be of concern in adverse aortic remodeling include distal anastomotic new entry tear (DANE) proximally, although this risk is reduced with the AMDS, tears at the level of the head vessels, stented portion of the aorta, or distal to the stent. Novel devices such as the AMDS have become increasingly utilized in aortic surgery and are accompanied by unique findings on postoperative CT scans that should be understood prior to reviewing such studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.