ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2026
Association of anesthetic technique with mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing surgery with one-lung ventilation under general anaesthesia.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: General anesthesia is the standard requirement for surgical procedures necessitating one-lung ventilation (OLV). The choice of anesthesia is a critical consideration, but which anesthetic modality is the most advantageous remains controversial. We evaluated the association of propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and inhalation anesthesia (INH) during OLV with mortality and morbidity. Methods: This population-based cohort study included adult patients who underwent OLV for surgery between January 1 and December 31, 2021, in South Korea. The INH and TIVA groups underwent 1:1 propensity score matching to balance patient characteristics before group comparisons. The endpoints were 90-day mortality, 1-year all-cause mortality, and postoperative complications. Results: The final study included 22,925 patients who underwent surgery with OLV under general anaesthesia. The INH and TIVA groups included 16,114 and 6,811 patients, respectively. After propensity score matching, data of 6,811 patients per group were compared. Logistic regression analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in the 90-day mortality rate between the two groups [odds ratio (OR) 1.08; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.91-1.28; P=0.37]. Moreover, the 1-year all-cause mortality rate did not differ significantly between the groups in Cox regression analysis (hazard ratio 1.07; 95% CI: 0.96-1.19; P=0.21). However, TIVA was associated with higher rates of sepsis, acute coronary events, acute kidney injury, and heart failure, whereas it was associated with lower rates of postoperative pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, and wound infection compared to the INH group. Conclusions: The type of anesthesia used during surgery with OLV was not significantly associated with 90-day or 1-year all-cause mortality. However, the choice of anesthetic agent appears to influence specific postoperative complication profiles, suggesting the need for an individualized approach based on patient-specific risk factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.