ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2026
Development of a CT-based integrated model combining clinical features, radiomics, and deep learning to predict STAS in subsolid nodules of stage I lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: For stage I lung cancer manifesting as subsolid nodules (SSNs) on computed tomography (CT), precise preoperative estimation of the spread through air spaces (STAS) is crucial for optimizing surgical strategies and enhancing patient prognosis. However, there is currently relatively limited research on the construction of predictive models through multi-feature fusion to enhance prediction performance. This study aimed to develop and internally validate an interpretable multi-modal model for preoperative prediction of STAS in stage I lung cancer with SSNs. Methods: This retrospective, single-center cohort study was conducted with the collection and analysis of relevant data obtained from 1,499 patients with stage I lung cancer showing SSNs on CT imaging and pathologically confirmed by Thoracic Surgery at The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital. Radiomics (RAD) and deep learning (DL) features were extracted from the dataset using Python 3.7 and advanced RAD feature extraction techniques, respectively. Furthermore, the cohort was divided into a training cohort (n=1,049) and an independent validation cohort (n=450) at a 7:3 ratio. Four types of predictive models were separated and built by using six machine learning methods. Model performance was assessed via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, decision curve analysis (DCA), and calibration curves. Additionally, the predictions made by the constructed model were interpreted and analyzed by employing the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Results: Clinical features such as age, family history of lung cancer, consolidation tumor ratio (CTR), pulmonary nodule density, cyst/cavitation, pleural indentation sign, bronchial changes, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) could predict STAS in stage I lung cancer presenting as SSNs. Furthermore, compared to the RAD model [area under the curve (AUC) =0.856, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.824-0.888 in the validation set], DL model (AUC =0.828, 95% CI: 0.791-0.865 in the validation set), and RAD + DL model (AUC =0.886, 95% CI: 0.850-0.922 in the validation set), clinical-radiomics-deep learning (CRDL) model exhibited superior predictive performance (AUC =0.955, 95% CI: 0.919-0.991 in the validation set). Conclusions: The integrated model combining clinical, RAD, and DL features demonstrates strong predictive performance and improved predictive accuracy for the presence of STAS in stage I lung cancer patients with SSNs, exhibiting potential clinical applicability. Further multi-center prospective validation is required before the model can be applied in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.