ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2026
Efficacy of bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement in reducing air leakage following pulmonary resection: a cadaveric study.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Air leakage remains a common complication following pulmonary resection and is frequently associated with the pulmonary staple line. Although bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement (SLR) has been introduced to reduce air leakage, standardized experimental data evaluating its immediate mechanical effect are limited. Thiel-preserved cadaveric lungs retain tissue flexibility and may provide a reproducible and controlled platform for comparative assessment of stapling techniques. This cadaveric study evaluated the immediate mechanical resistance of pulmonary staple lines using Thiel-preserved human lungs. Partial pulmonary resections were performed using a powered linear stapler with or without bioabsorbable SLR. Airway pressure was gradually increased during ventilation, and the pressure at which air leakage from the staple line was first observed during a water-sealing test was recorded. Because of the limited number of specimens, results were evaluated descriptively without formal statistical analysis. Staple lines created with bioabsorbable reinforcement tended to tolerate higher airway pressures before air leakage occurred compared with non-reinforced staple lines. In several specimens, reinforcement delayed air leakage, whereas in others, the difference was minimal. No device-related technical failures were observed. In a Thiel-preserved cadaveric lung model, bioabsorbable SLR showed a tendency to increase the airway pressure tolerance prior to air leakage. Given the small sample size and the absence of biological processes inherent to living tissue, these findings should be interpreted cautiously. Nevertheless, this study supports the methodological utility of Thiel-preserved cadaveric lungs as a standardized and reproducible platform for comparative evaluation of pulmonary stapling techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.