ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2026
Automated identification of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma using impulse oscillometry combined with quantitative computed tomography parameters and radiomics features.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma are two common chronic inflammatory diseases that are difficult to distinguish clinically. While pulmonary function tests (PFTs) are considered the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) standard for diagnosing these two diseases, they have inherent drawbacks, such as heavily relying on patient cooperation. This study aimed to explore the ability of impulse oscillometry system (IOS), quantitative computed tomography (QCT) imaging and radiomics features for differentiating between COPD and asthma. Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 151 patients, including 67 COPD patients and 84 asthma patients who completed inspiratory high-resolution computed tomography (CT) scans with recorded demographics, PFTs and IOS data from January 2021 to September 2023 from The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University. The NeuLungCARE-QA software (Neusoft Medical Systems Co., Ltd., Shenyang, China) was used to extract QCT parameters. The radiomics features were calculated using the Pyradiomics package. After features selection, the logistic regression method was used for model construction. An additional 37 patients were recruited as the external validation set to validate the model's generalization. Results: There were significant differences in PFT parameters (P<0.001), IOS indices (P<0.05), and emphysema parameters (P<0.001) between COPD and asthma groups. Model 6, which combined IOS indices, QCT parameters, and radiomics features, achieved the best performance with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values of 0.959 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.918-0.989], 0.960 (95% CI: 0.909-0.999) and 0.949 (95% CI: 0.871-0.999) in the training set, testing set, external validation set, respectively. The DeLong test comparing the fusion features-based Model 6 with the PFTs-based Model 1 showed no significant differences in training set, testing set and external validation set, respectively. Conclusions: The IOS indices, along with quantitative CT imaging and radiomics features, could provide a reliable tool for differentiating asthma from COPD patients. This approach could serve as an alternative and/or a complement method for patients who find it difficult to perform PFTs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.