Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42182724›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2026

Retrospective comparison of three-dimensional computed tomography bronchography and angiography-assisted indocyanine green reverse staining versus modified inflation-deflation in robotic-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomy.

Chen Liu, Hao Peng, Maitiyasen Maierhaba, Yuanpeng He, Bingjie Niu, Jun Yi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chen Liu *Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Hao Peng *Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Maitiyasen Maierhaba *Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Yuanpeng HeDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Bingjie NiuDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Jun YiDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Over the long term, the modified inflation-deflation method has been widely recognized as a strategy for identifying the intersegmental plane. However, with the advancement of technology, an increasing number of methods for intersegmental plane identification have emerged, such as the intravenous indocyanine green (ICG) injection method, which can display the intersegmental plane more accurately. This study aims to provide a single-center retrospective comparative evaluation of the safety, feasibility, and perioperative outcomes of intravenous ICG reverse staining versus the modified inflation-deflation method for intersegmental plane delineation in robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) segmentectomy. Methods: We collected data from 117 consecutive patients who underwent RATS segmentectomy at Jinling Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University between September 2022 and November 2024, all of whom received preoperative three-dimensional computed tomography bronchography and angiography (3D-CTBA) reconstruction for surgical planning, including 57 patients in the ICG group and 60 patients in the modified inflation-deflation group. A retrospective analysis was conducted on surgery-related indicators such as operation time, intersegmental boundary demonstration time, and intraoperative blood loss, as well as the incidence of postoperative complications, between the two groups. Results: All patients successfully completed the surgery. The operation time of the ICG group (112.11±26.12 min) was significantly shorter than that of the modified inflation-deflation group (129.37±34.35 min) [t=-3.07; P=0.003; Cohen's d=-0.56; 95% confidence interval (CI): -28.48, -6.04]. The intersegmental boundary display time of the ICG group (9.44±2.19 s) was remarkably shorter than that of the modified inflation-deflation group (1,068.08±229.40 s), with statistically significant differences (t=-35.74; P<0.001; Cohen's d=-6.44; 95% CI: -1,118.85, -998.44). Additionally, the intraoperative blood loss of the ICG group (73.07±39.37 mL) was significantly less than that of the modified inflation-deflation group (113.00±59.75 mL), and the difference was statistically significant (t=-4.24; P<0.001; Cohen's d=-0.79; 95% CI: -58.40, -21.46). Conclusions: In RATS segmental lung resection with preoperative 3D-CTBA reconstruction, the ICG reverse staining method for intersegmental plane delineation is associated with shorter intersegmental boundary display time, clearer boundaries, less intraoperative blood loss, and shorter operation time compared with the modified inflation-deflation method. These findings provide comparative evidence to support clinical decision-making, while long-term oncological outcomes require further validation.

Indexed as

indocyanine green (ICG)lung tumorrobot-assisted thoracic surgerySegmental lung resectionthree-dimensional reconstruction (3D reconstruction)

Identifiers

PMID42182724
PMCPMC13190225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.