ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2026
Complication of silicone stent in the management of airway stenosis: a single-center experience.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Management of benign tracheal stenosis: rigid bronchoscopy versus serial cannulas-a retrospective cohort study from a tertiary center.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Airway stenosis is a potentially life-threatening condition that often requires endoscopic intervention to maintain airway patency. Silicone stents are widely used in benign and selected malignant stenoses; however, their placement is frequently associated with adverse events. Despite increasing use in Mexico and Latin America, institutional data describing complication patterns and associated imaging findings remain limited. This study aimed to describe the complications associated with silicone airway stents, as well as their clinical, technical, and tomographic characteristics in a single-center experience. Methods: We conducted an observational, descriptive, retrospective study at the National Institute of Respiratory Diseases, Mexico City. Adult patients with subglottic or central airway stenosis who underwent silicone stent placement between January 2019 and January 2025 and developed at least one stent-related complication during follow-up were included. Demographic, clinical, technical, and imaging variables were analyzed. Complications were defined as any stent- or procedure-related adverse event requiring bronchoscopic intervention, stent replacement, or specific therapeutic management. Chest computed tomography (CT) findings were descriptively correlated with bronchoscopic findings in clinically indicated evaluations. Results: Twenty-three patients with silicone stents who developed at least one complication met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 42 years [interquartile range (IQR), 34-53 years], and 60.9% were women. The mean BMI was 26.8 kg/m Conclusions: Among patients who developed complications after silicone airway stent placement, adverse events were frequent and occurred early during follow-up. Chest CT showed high agreement with bronchoscopy in clinically indicated assessments and may serve as a complementary, non-invasive tool for evaluating stent-related complications. The presence of air pockets may represent an early radiologic finding preceding migration; however, this observation should be considered hypothesis-generating.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.