ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2026
Prognostic significance of post-bronchoscopy sputum cytology in lung cancer diagnosed by bronchoscopy: a retrospective cohort study of 625 patients.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Post-bronchoscopy sputum cytology (PBS) is traditionally considered a supplementary diagnostic tool for lung cancer; however, its prognostic relevance in bronchoscopically confirmed cases remains unclear. This study evaluated the clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic value of PBS positivity in patients with bronchoscopically diagnosed lung cancer. Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study included 625 patients with newly diagnosed, bronchoscopically confirmed lung cancer, who underwent PBS between May 2007 and December 2024. Patients were classified as PBS-positive and PBS-negative. Clinical characteristics, tumor features, and overall survival (OS) were compared. Factors associated with PBS positivity were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression. Prognostic factors for OS were assessed using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Among the 625 patients, 82 (13.1%) were PBS-positive. PBS-positive patients were significantly younger and more likely to have advanced T-factor tumors, larger primary tumors, and proximal airway involvement. Younger age and advanced T-factor were independently associated with PBS positivity. Median OS was significantly shorter in the PBS-positive group than in the PBS-negative group (median 14.3 Conclusions: PBS positivity was associated with aggressive tumor characteristics and independently predicted poor OS in bronchoscopically confirmed lung cancer. Although its diagnostic value may be limited, PBS positivity represents a simple, noninvasive prognostic marker that may support risk stratification and clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.