ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2026
Effectiveness of heterologous mRNA vaccine boosters during an Omicron wave of COVID-19: a cross-sectional study in Macao (China).
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Inactivated vaccines have been widely used in China and many low- and middle-income countries, but real-world evidence on the protective effectiveness of heterologous mRNA boosters after a SinoPharm primary regimen during Omicron waves in Chinese populations remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the real-world infection protection effectiveness of a SinoPharm primary regimen with mRNA boosters during the 2022 Omicron (BF.7 and BA5.2 variants) wave in Macao, China. Methods: An online survey conducted for two days among Macao residents towards the end of the 2022 Omicron wave gathered 4,879 responses (61.7% female, n=3,010). Among the participants, 83.2% (n=4,052) reported receiving the SinoPharm primary vaccination regimen, while 20% (n=827) reported receiving mRNA boosters; 71.4% of respondents reported confirmed infections, with an average duration of 5.4 days testing positive. Logistic and Ordinary Least Squared regressions were utilized to analyze the infection risk and the number of days testing positive. Results: When compared to those who received a three-dose inactivated vaccine, those with one-dose mRNA booster shows a significantly lower likelihood of confirmed infection [odds ratio (OR) =0.421, P<0.01]. In the event of an infection, they also experienced a decreased likelihood of developing fever (OR =0.290, P<0.01), and fewer sick days (-0.931, P<0.05). Conclusions: Heterologous vaccination is recommendable for both the Chinese population and other low-to-middle-income countries that have predominantly adopted inactivated vaccines as their primary regimen. Future studies are needed to examine the long-term effects, which could not be assessed in this survey.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.