ArticleJournal of the Intensive Care Society2026
Effects of expiratory muscle strength training on swallowing in survivors of critical illness: A systematic review and narrative synthesis.
Article in Journal of the Intensive Care Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Post-extubation dysphagia (PED) is a common complication of critical illness and is associated with aspiration pneumonia, prolonged hospitalisation, and prolonged recovery. Expiratory muscle strength training (EMST) has been shown to improve swallowing function in selected populations, but its role in survivors of critical illness remains unclear. Objective: To systematically review the evidence evaluating the effects of EMST on swallowing outcomes in survivors of critical illness with PED. Methods: This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023444479) and conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Searches of MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases were performed from 2000 to March 2026. Eligible studies included adult patients requiring >48 h of mechanical ventilation who underwent volitional EMST following extubation. Due to anticipated limited evidence, all quantitative study designs were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. Meta-analysis was not performed due to heterogeneity. Results: Three studies met inclusion criteria, including two from the same research group: one case series ( Conclusions: Evidence supporting EMST for PED in survivors of critical illness is extremely limited and of low methodological quality. Whilst mechanistic plausibility and data from other populations suggest potential benefit, robust randomised controlled trials with standardised training protocols and outcome measures are required before clinical implementation can be recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.