ArticleAsia Pacific allergy2026
Tick bite prevention and management: integrating patient perspectives to shape patient education.
Article in Asia Pacific allergy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The rise in tick anaphylaxis (TA) in Australia and worldwide underscores the need for effective tick bite prevention and management strategies. Objectives: This retrospective survey of a clinical TA cohort aimed to determine prevention and management strategies employed by patients who had received education following diagnosis of TA and identify areas for improvement in patient education. Methods: Patients diagnosed with TA by a consultant immunologist between 2005 and 2021 in NSW, Australia, completed a survey in 2021 assessing tick bite recurrence, life stage identification, removal methods, need for medical assistance, prevention strategies, and geographic tick bite locations. Relationships between tick bite occurrence and prevention methods, such as the use of permethrin-treated clothing and backyard pest control, were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests. Results: Despite receiving education at the time of their previous TA, 59% of patients experienced further tick bites, and 50% struggled to identify the tick life stage. Preferred prevention methods included avoidance, untreated clothing, and repellents, with some using backyard insecticides. We observed a trend towards reduced tick bite recurrence among patients who treated their backyards and wore permethrin-treated clothing. Almost 46% of bites occurred in patients' backyards. Adherence to tick removal advice was highly variable. Only 30% of patients sought medical help when bitten again. Conclusion: The recurrence of tick bite in TA patients despite education at first diagnosis indicates a need for clearer and more frequent education to encourage adherence to prevention strategies, targeting high-risk groups, to prevent further fatalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.