Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42182603›Full record

ArticleAsia Pacific allergy2026

Tick bite prevention and management: integrating patient perspectives to shape patient education.

Katherine Duong, Melanie Burk, David Boettiger, Bronte Cross, Ayesha Owen, Jordan Symons, Andrew Ratchford, Sheryl van Nunen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asia Pacific allergy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Katherine DuongNorthern Beaches Clinical School, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4500-3794
Melanie BurkTiARA (Tick-induced Allergies Research and Awareness), Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4863-0357
David BoettigerHunter New England Local Health District, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5951-4503
Bronte CrossNorthern Beaches Clinical School, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Ayesha OwenNorthern Beaches Clinical School, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9347-6117
Jordan SymonsNorthern Beaches Clinical School, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Andrew RatchfordNorthern Beaches Clinical School, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Sheryl van NunenTiARA (Tick-induced Allergies Research and Awareness), Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8192-7008

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The rise in tick anaphylaxis (TA) in Australia and worldwide underscores the need for effective tick bite prevention and management strategies. Objectives: This retrospective survey of a clinical TA cohort aimed to determine prevention and management strategies employed by patients who had received education following diagnosis of TA and identify areas for improvement in patient education. Methods: Patients diagnosed with TA by a consultant immunologist between 2005 and 2021 in NSW, Australia, completed a survey in 2021 assessing tick bite recurrence, life stage identification, removal methods, need for medical assistance, prevention strategies, and geographic tick bite locations. Relationships between tick bite occurrence and prevention methods, such as the use of permethrin-treated clothing and backyard pest control, were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests. Results: Despite receiving education at the time of their previous TA, 59% of patients experienced further tick bites, and 50% struggled to identify the tick life stage. Preferred prevention methods included avoidance, untreated clothing, and repellents, with some using backyard insecticides. We observed a trend towards reduced tick bite recurrence among patients who treated their backyards and wore permethrin-treated clothing. Almost 46% of bites occurred in patients' backyards. Adherence to tick removal advice was highly variable. Only 30% of patients sought medical help when bitten again. Conclusion: The recurrence of tick bite in TA patients despite education at first diagnosis indicates a need for clearer and more frequent education to encourage adherence to prevention strategies, targeting high-risk groups, to prevent further fatalities.

Indexed as

Anaphylaxisfood hypersensitivityhealth educationticks

Identifiers

PMID42182603
PMCPMC13193260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.