Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42182543›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Dysfibrinogenemia in Pregnancy: A Case Series Highlighting Diagnostic Challenges and Multidisciplinary Management.

Supreet Mahurkar, Ejike Nnamani, Sarah Lewis, Sajitha Parveen

Erratum issuedAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Supreet MahurkarObstetrics and Gynaecology, Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, Gwent, GBR.
Ejike NnamaniObstetrics and Gynaecology, Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, Gwent, GBR.
Sarah LewisHaematology, Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, Gwent, GBR.
Sajitha ParveenObstetrics and Gynaecology, Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, Gwent, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dysfibrinogenemia is a rare qualitative fibrinogen disorder associated with both bleeding and thrombotic risks, presenting unique diagnostic and management challenges in pregnancy. Physiological increases in fibrinogen during pregnancy may obscure underlying abnormalities, and reliance on functional assays alone can result in misinterpretation and inappropriate management. We present a case series of three pregnant patients in whom dysfibrinogenemia was either incidentally identified during antenatal care or recognised through prior family screening. All cases demonstrated persistently low functional fibrinogen levels measured using the Clauss method, with normal antigenic fibrinogen levels on enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), consistent with qualitative fibrinogen defects. Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) was used to aid real‑time haemostatic assessment. Multidisciplinary management involving obstetricians, anaesthetists, and haematologists enabled individualised care, resulting in successful outcomes including spontaneous vaginal delivery, caesarean section under general anaesthesia, and medically indicated termination, without significant haemorrhagic complications. This series highlights the importance of distinguishing qualitative from quantitative fibrinogen disorders and cautions against reflexive fibrinogen replacement based solely on functional assays. A structured diagnostic approach, supported by antigen testing and viscoelastic assessment, is essential to guide safe and effective management in pregnancy.

Indexed as

disorders of fibrinogendysfibrinogenemiahigh risk obstetricslow fibrinogenpregnancy

Identifiers

PMID42182543
PMCPMC13193692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.