ArticleTechnical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology2026
Upright versus supine positioning for breast and lung radiotherapy: a pilot study on patient comfort, experience and lung function.
Article in Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Delivering radiotherapy in upright body positions (UP) may offer advantages for breast and lung cancer treatments due to physiological/anatomical differences compared to the supine position (SP), as well as potential cost savings when establishing new treatment rooms. This pilot study compared (i) patient experiences and (ii) lung function parameters for upright UP versus SP, among a cohort of patients undergoing conventional (supine) radiotherapy for breast or lung cancer. After ethical approval, 8 breast and 7 lung cancer patients were enrolled in this study. Five research appointments were conducted for each patient. Patients were set-up with UP and SP with their arms raised out of the thoracic region. Through questionnaires, patients reported on any discomfort, their general experiences and their preferred setup. Spirometry-based measurements taken included the tidal Volume (Vt), Vital Capacity (VC), and maximum duration of Deep Inspiration Breath Holding (DIBH). Expiratory Reserve Volume (ERV), Inspiratory Capacity (IC) were calculated. Discomfort was most frequently reported in the lower back during SP and in the knees during UP. Nine patients preferred UP for physical comfort and 8 preferred UP for DIBH whereas 1 and 6 preferred SP respectively. Patients described significantly less pain when they stood up after the UP than after SP. In UP, ERV was significantly larger (p < 0.05), while Vt and IC were significantly smaller (p > 0.05) compared to UP. There was no difference in VC between the two positions (p = 0.17). The majority of patients preferred UP and reported being more comfortable in UP in comparison to SP. Overall, body position influences Vt, ERV and IC but no differences were observed in VC, consistent with the literature. DIBH was feasible for all patients in both positions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.