ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Principles of Local and Global Grouping that Underlie Segmentation of Natural Texture Images.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The human visual system segments images using both high-level recognition mechanisms and low-level mechanisms that are largely independent of specific prior experience. The low-level mechanisms are essential for initiating recognition processes, and for learning to recognize new materials, objects, and contexts. Here we describe a hierarchical Bayesian observer (HBO) model of texture segmentation that is biologically plausible, takes into account the statistics of natural scenes, and does not depend on prior experience. The HBO model consists of five steps: local similarity grouping with local normalization, mutual similarity grouping (local grouping is strengthened if the neighboring regions are similar to the same set of other regions), transitive grouping (good continuation), confidence grouping (neighboring regions far from the same-different decision boundary guide grouping of regions near the decision boundary), and region grouping (similarity grouping of the regions from the initial segmentation). We find that a local similarity grouping process, trained to maximize accuracy, predicts human texture discrimination accuracy. We then find that the four additional steps accurately segment images with randomly shaped regions containing arbitrary natural textures. The success of the model depends on all the steps, but especially on local-similarity and transitive grouping. We also find that the transitive grouping allows correct segmentation of non-stationary texture regions (e.g., textures slanted in depth). Further, we find that when illumination varies across the image, local normalization enables both correct texture segmentation and estimation of illumination change. Finally, we find that unlike our model large state-of-the-art deep networks often fail on these stimuli.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.