ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Opposing effects of slow and fast theta synchrony on working memory in the human hippocampal-orbitofrontal network.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Working memory (WM) enables us to maintain and manipulate information over time, but how the brain organizes sequential information locally and across networks remains unclear. Recent work suggests that slow and fast theta oscillations serve different roles in memory, yet their distinct contributions to sequential WM are unknown. Based on evidence that the hippocampus (HC) and orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) support sequential WM and that slower theta cycles provide optimal temporal windows for organizing items in WM, we predicted that these regions would coordinate via slow theta dynamics. We analyzed intracranial EEG from the HC, OFC, and amygdala (AMY) in 21 neurosurgical patients (7 female, 13-54 years of age; M ± SD, 30 ± 11.2 years) performing a delayed match-to-sample WM task. We assessed phase locking between regions, phase-amplitude coupling within regions, and neuronal phase coding for slow (~1-4.5 Hz) and fast (~4.5-8 Hz) theta oscillations. We found significant slow and fast theta synchrony between all regions, but identical anatomical pathways produced opposing behavioral effects depending on oscillatory frequency, particularly during higher cognitive demand. Slow theta synchrony was associated with faster response times (RTs), while fast theta synchrony between HC and OFC hindered both accuracy and RTs. Unexpectedly, AMY modulated RT through demand-dependent slow theta synchrony, where AMY-OFC synchrony predicted faster RTs during maintenance and HC-AMY synchrony predicted faster RTs during higher cognitive demand. Sustained coupling between slow theta oscillations and high-frequency broadband activity within each region suggests that local organization coincides with beneficial network behavioral effects. These results establish a frequency-opponent mechanism in which theta oscillation frequencies determine whether HC-OFC circuits facilitate or impair sequential WM.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.