ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Spatiotemporal encoding of touch signals in the human somatosensory and motor cortices.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The sense of touch is fundamental for dexterous manipulation, object interaction, and body awareness. It is primarily processed in the somatosensory cortex (SC), yet our understanding of how tactile information is encoded at the level of neural populations and single neurons in humans remains limited. It is unclear how natural tactile signals are represented in SC and how they may be influenced by visual inputs, as well as how closely sensory and motor cortices interact during passive touch. Here, we investigated the neural basis of touch in the human SC using chronically implanted microelectrode arrays in three participants. By delivering controlled mechanical stimuli, we characterized neural responses to natural touch and mapped detailed somatotopic receptive fields (the patch of skin that elicits neural responses when stimulated) in humans, including multidigit representations. Surprisingly, we also found strong, clearly somatotopic activation in the motor cortex (MC) during passive touch, even in the absence of movement, highlighting a tight and functionally relevant sensorimotor coupling. We further examined how vision shapes tactile processing by comparing neural activity during actual touch with and without vision, and during observation of touch on another person's hand. While touch to the participants' hands elicited robust, event-locked, and somatotopically organized responses in the SC, observation of tactile actions alone did not produce significant activation, suggesting limited vicarious encoding at this level. These findings provide a detailed characterization of human touch processing at the level of neuronal populations and give insights for the design of microstimulation strategies of the SC for the restoration of touch.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.