ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Brain charts for neuroanatomical sex differences across the human lifespan.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Population-level sex biases in human neuroanatomy have been highly debated, with prior literature often limited by narrow age windows and simplistic assumptions about how brain regions scale with sex differences in average total brain size. Recent work leveraging massive, global datasets to flexibly chart normative brain structures across the lifespan provides a framework to overcome these hurdles. Here, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data from over 100,000 individuals (51.7% F) from mid-gestation to 99 years, we chart normative population trajectories of 241 structural features capturing age-varying sex effects. We use split-half cross-validation, fitting generalized additive models for location, shape, and scale with nonlinear scaling terms to test sex's impact on each feature's distribution and map changes in sex biases over time. Our results reveal replicably significant age-varying sex biases in nearly all brain structures, and show that sex's effects survive nonlinear correction for total brain size. We find that after correcting for total brain size, regions are equally likely to be larger in males versus females, while males tend to show higher interindividual variability in a majority of regions. Probing temporal dynamics reveals that sex biases tend to increase with age, with male and female trajectories diverging across the lifespan. Finally, we demonstrate that normative scores from these models of age-varying sex effects are sensitive to case-control differences in six neuropsychiatric disorders. This work resolves several existing methodological issues to establish and quantify population-level sex biases in the largest-to-date study of lifespan sex-biases in the human brain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.