ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
A novel method to select Reference Proteomes in UniProt.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Motivation: The ongoing revolution in genome sequencing is delivering an unprecedented number of genome assemblies to global repositories, resulting in an overwhelming amount of data imported to UniProt in the form of proteomes. To manage this growth sustainably, there is a need for a systematic workflow to select the best proteomes. Results: We propose a novel pipeline for cellular organisms to select the best Reference Proteomes, i.e. those that best represent the protein space of a species. The pipeline uses a clustering algorithm based on MMseqs2 to select the minimum number of Reference Proteomes whilst maximising the representation of the protein space for each species. Additionally, we aligned our viral Reference Proteomes with the exemplar genome set defined by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. Because this method ensures that all species are represented with at least one Reference Proteome, the UniProt Knowledgebase increased the number of Reference Proteomes of 36% and covering 34% more species in the Tree of Life. The UniProt Knowledgebase will mainly retain proteins from Reference Proteomes and therefore this method reduces the overall number of proteins by 43%, leading to a more concise yet representative knowledgebase.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.