ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Drug Proarrhythmic Evaluation in a High Throughput Cardiac New Approach Methodology.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background and Purpose: Cardiotoxicity is a major cause for drug failure throughout the drug development process, with particular concern for action potential prolongation and arrhythmia. Hence, such liabilities are heavily considered during the early phases of drug design to prevent dangerous compounds from progressing. New approach methodologies ( Methods: We dramatically increased throughput without compromising physiological relevance provided by the 3D micromuscle structure. Our 384-well open bath high-throughput platform allowed evaluation of multiple compounds at a time, enabling us to study the CiPA (comprehensive in vitro proarrhythmia assay) drug panel for proarrhythmia screening. We obtained phenotypic fingerprints of all 28 compounds (9 low, 11 intermediate, and 8 high arrhythmia risk; https://cipaproject.org) in dose-escalation studies around their respective clinical concentrations. The analysis was augmented with an Results and Conclusions: We found accurate detection of arrhythmic potential for most of the compounds, and the
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.