Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42182185›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

Meaning for reading pseudowords: errors reveal semantic influences on pseudoword reading after stroke.

Ryan Staples, Elizabeth J Anderson, Sara M Dyslin, Alycia B Laks, Rhonda B Friedman, Andrew T DeMarco, Peter E Turkeltaub

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ryan StaplesCenter for Brain Plasticity and Recovery, Departments of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA 20057.
Elizabeth J AndersonCenter for Brain Plasticity and Recovery, Departments of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA 20057.
Sara M DyslinCenter for Brain Plasticity and Recovery, Departments of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA 20057.
Alycia B LaksCenter for Brain Plasticity and Recovery, Departments of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA 20057.
Rhonda B FriedmanCenter for Aphasia Research and Rehabilitation, Department of Neurology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA 20057.ORCID 0000-0001-6366-5251
Andrew T DeMarcoCenter for Brain Plasticity and Recovery, Departments of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA 20057.
Peter E TurkeltaubCenter for Brain Plasticity and Recovery, Departments of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA 20057.

Funding

Contributions of spared brain structures and connections to aphasia recoveryR01DC014960 · NIDCD · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI TURKELTAUB, PETER ETHAN · 2017 to 2021
$4.0M
Brain networks for reading in stroke alexia and typical agingR01DC020446 · NIDCD · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI RHONDA B FRIEDMAN, Peter Ethan Turkeltaub · 2022 to 2026
$3.2M
Georgetown University Brain and Language Training ProgramT32DC019481 · NIDCD · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI Peter Ethan Turkeltaub · 2022 to 2026
$2.1M
Functional anomaly mapping of aphasia recoveryR00DC018828 · NIDCD · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI DEMARCO, ANDREW T · 2023 to 2025
$747k
NIDCD NIH HHS R00 DC018828NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014960NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC020446NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC019481
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Impaired reading, i.e., alexia, is common after left hemisphere stroke. The most common deficit in alexia is a difficulty reading aloud pronounceable novel words, also called pseudowords. While semantic and phonological processes both subserve reading real words, pseudoword reading deficits in alexia are typically ascribed to phonological deficits alone. Some theories, however, suggest that pseudoword reading relies in part on lexical-semantic knowledge, such that semantic deficits could also contribute to poor pseudoword reading in alexia. Leveraging a large sample of left-hemisphere stroke survivors, we examine the cognitive and neural substrates of pseudoword reading accuracy and two error types: lexicalization errors, where a pseudoword is incorrectly read as a real word, and nonword errors, where a pseudoword is read as an incorrect nonword. 76 left-hemisphere stroke survivors read 60 pseudowords aloud, and performed two pseudoword repetition tasks to assess phonological processing and two picture naming tasks to assess mappings between lexical semantics and phonology. Regression models assessed how pseudoword repetition and naming related to overall accuracy and rates of lexicalization and nonword errors in pseudoword reading. Voxel-based and connectome lesion-symptom mapping localized the neural territory responsible for these errors. Pseudoword repetition and naming independently related to pseudoword reading accuracy. Pseudoword repetition but not naming deficits predicted higher rates of lexicalization errors, while naming but not pseudoword repetition deficits predicted higher rates of nonword errors. Greater nonword error rate also predicted smaller imageability effects in real word reading (

Indexed as

Alexiaphonologypseudowordsreadingsemantics

Identifiers

PMID42182185
PMCPMC13192619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.